glibc-19980524: invalid use of GCC's `transparent union'
Philip Blundell
pb@nexus.co.uk
Tue May 26 02:00:00 GMT 1998
>uniform way. I'd say we use ANSI-style declarations of the wait?
>functions all over, and I am willing to make the fixes, but it might
>take a few days...
That sounds like a good idea. Roland also suggested a few months ago that we
should try to get a transparent_union case added to the gcc regression test
suite to stop it getting broken again in future. Can someone involved with
egcs look into that?
p.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list