[PATCHES] glibc 2.1, Linux, and chown
Andreas Schwab
schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
Mon Dec 14 02:12:00 GMT 1998
Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com> writes:
|> Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> writes:
|>
|> > On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 10:17:18AM -0800, Jim Pick wrote:
|> > > Alpha is different.
|> >
|> > At issue is that Alpha didn't go through the same syscall number
|> > changes as everyone else. We'd been following DU, which already
|> > defined both chown and lchown.
|>
|> Fair enough. It's obvious I didn't get the issues right the first
|> time around.
|>
|> Let me see if I understand this:
|>
|> Note: 2.1 = 2.1.124 and 2.0 = 2.0.36
|>
|> Arch KVer Syscall Behaviour
|> ====== ==== ======= =========
|> i386/ 2.0 16 = __NR_chown Does not follow symlinks
|> m68k/
|> ppc
|>
|> i386/ 2.1 16 = __NR_lchown Does not follow symlinks
|> m68k 182 = __NR_chown Follows symlinks
This is wrong. On m68k it's just the other way round.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de completely different"
schwab@gnu.org
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list