[Bug default/26646] unexpected declaration-only types
dodji at seketeli dot org
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Thu Mar 3 11:43:59 GMT 2022
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26646
--- Comment #33 from dodji at seketeli dot org ---
Giuliano Procida via Libabigail <libabigail@sourceware.org> a écrit:
>> Does that make any sense?
>>
>
> I think it makes some sense, but it would take me some time to read
> through, digest and reason about this properly.
>
> Instead... I'm going to advertise my comparison algorithm again (for
> which I've already done all the hard thinking and testing). :-) I'm
> not sure how directly applicable it is to canonicalisation, but there
> is the *potential* to eliminate all redundant comparisons.
OK, I think this would be whole project in itself, as far as I am
concerned. Right now, I am interested in fixing this issue in a 'best
effort' mode, keeping most of the existing infrastructure for the sake
of consistency and limiting the unintended impacts, release a 2.1
tarball and then we can talk about this further if you like.
I am not ditching what you are saying. Just that this place (patch
review and this bug report) doesn't seem like the best place for this
right now.
Rather, a new comparison algorithm altogether being a project in itself
(IMHO), it'd be better to keep this discussion under its own "feature
request bug report", I'd say.
I understand if you don't have time to review what I am proposing. I'll
thus go ahead and look at your proposal a bit later.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Libabigail
mailing list