GSOC | Extending Common Lisp support

[Charles Turner]

On 21 June 2012 14:48, Jamison Hope <jrh@theptrgroup.com> wrote:
>> So I'm still missing the (Declarations:
>> f/15/fl:408c8::gnu.mapping.Procedure) line,
>
>
> No you aren't, it just got pretty-printed differently (on the
> previous line). It *is* missing the "::gnu.mapping.Procedure"
> type info, but that probably doesn't matter here.

Well it is causing a cast to be made in the bytecode (along with the
other stuff that goes with that), which at least non-optimal. But at
least it's narrowed down to just the NOT form not being wrapped in
Declaration. To be honest, I'm starting to think this doesn't make
much difference!

Charlie.