[jwi@pl.ibm.com: 1.3.20: [incr Tcl/Tk] interpreters missing]

[Keith Seitz]

On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 08:57, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Is the lack of itclsh.exe intentional?

Yes. There is no more itclsh, tixsh, *sh.

You run tclsh and do "package require Itcl" now. Although I note that
our build is broken, since we're building it static when it MUST be
built shared (on linux, at least). :-(

If I find the time, I'll see about fixing this.
Keith