GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc

[Andrew Cagney]

[added insight]

> On May 29, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Another problem showed up while building gdbtk.  gdb/defs.h #includes
>> <stdarg.h>, but tcl/generic/tclInt.h #includes <varargs.h>, because
>> HAS_STDARG is not defined.
> 
> 
>> It turns out that the va_start macro defined in varargs.h ends up
>> overriding that of stdarg.h, so we call va_start with the wrong number
>> of arguments.
> 
> 
>> Since GDB assumes the existence of stdarg.h, I suppose this patch
>> would be acceptable.  Ok to install?
> 
> 
> This one seems to have never been acknowledged.  Ok for 5.2 and
> mainline?

I don't know that this belongs in defs.h (definitly not without a big 
comment explaining the history :-).  As you note, gdb doesn't include 
tclInt.h, only GDBTK.  I suspect gdbtk/generic/gdbtk.h or autoconf is 
better?

Andrew

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc
Date: 06 Mar 2002 21:12:47 -0300
Size: 4215
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/insight/attachments/20020306/1a0e6a57/attachment.eml>