GSL v2.0 discussion

[Patrick Alken]

On 04/04/2014 02:52 PM, Patrick Alken wrote:
> I need to look into whether lapack2flame accepts LAPACKE calls or just
> LAPACK calls (I don't see any reference to LAPACKE in the flame user
> manual). In any case, lapack is usually installed by default on many
> systems, whereas lapacke is probably not, so it may be worth supporting
> lapack instead.

Looking into this further it seems LAPACKE is included by default in 
recent lapack installations, which is very nice. I like how LAPACKE 
supports both row/column major matrix inputs - it seems this would make 
things much easier for us and we still might be able to use lapack2flame 
by linking with -llapacke but not -llapack?