Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0
Fri Feb 19 20:22:00 GMT 2010
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:50:44 -0600,
Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> I'm willing to take a stab at providing the necessary error handling
> underneath flame to make it play nice with GSL's error handling
> The obvious choice is to adopt GSL's routines. However, flame is
> LGPL and so adopting GSL's GPLed error handling directly is not an
> Do you know of an LGPL project that you believe does a good job in
> this regard?
I think the amount of code is so small that the licensing shouldn't be
a concern here. If anyone wants to use the error macro definitions or
error handler from GSL under the LGPL I am fine with that.
More information about the Gsl-discuss