gsl container designs

Brian Gough
Thu Jan 7 18:29:00 GMT 2010

At Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:44:56 +0200,
Tuomo Keskitalo wrote:
> Do you mean the compatibility to GSL 1 types by the compatibility cost? 
> When talking about GSL 2 I don't think we should give too much value to 
> maintaining backwards compatibility. GSL 1 is not going to cease to 
> exist, and people who have tied themselves deeply to GSL 1 data 
> structures can continue to use it.

I'd say it's a significant benefit if people don't have to modify
their code. 

Brian Gough

More information about the Gsl-discuss mailing list