Mon Jun 15 10:30:00 GMT 2009
At Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:39:33 -0500,
Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> I've got a licensing question. An individual has some nice routines
> that I believe fill gaps in the GSL integration functionality.
> These routines are LGPL. Is it possible for the individual to make
> a GPL/LGPL one-off release that could be pulled into GSL without
> "screwing up" the LGPL licensing he currently uses?
As I understand it, this wouldn't be needed - it is not necessary to
make a separate release. Any code under the LGPL can always be used
under the GPL by anyone, there are clauses in the LGPL which
explicitly allow this.
I'm assuming we are talking about version 3 of the GPL here, or
version 2 with the "any later version" permission.
> Specifically, could he continue to update and release his own
> routine modifications under only the LGPL?
Yes, I wouldn't see that being a problem.
More information about the Gsl-discuss