cvs version: make check FAIL

Brian Gough bjg@network-theory.co.uk
Thu Jun 1 12:33:00 GMT 2006


Lowell Johnson writes:
 > Sure, that sounds fine to me.  The cost of the extra fabs() is rather 
 > trivial, but avoiding it will save a few clock cycles.
 > 
 > I've attached a patch to be used in place of the earlier patch.

Thanks, now added to the sources.redhat.com repository.

-- 
Brian Gough

Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing Free Software Manuals --- http://www.network-theory.co.uk/



More information about the Gsl-discuss mailing list