coming version: naive question
Jochen Küpper
jochen@fhi-berlin.mpg.de
Thu Aug 25 09:15:00 GMT 2005
Jerome BENOIT <jgmbenoit@mailsnare.net> writes:
> does GSL able to take advantage of 64 machine ?
That's probably more a compiler issue...
cvs-HEAD does actually pass all tests on out Opteron systems (Suse
9.3, gcc-3.3.x). And (some of) the code is running blastingly fast,
see my recent post on rng-"benchmarks".
> For example, the magic constants in gsl_machine.h are desigend for
> 32 machine rather than 64 machine ?
double has the same precision on ix86 and ix86_64 for that matter.
Machines/systems where double is more than 8 bytes are pretty rare --
nowadays even more so;)
Greetings,
Jochen
--
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D
(Part 3 you find in my messages before fall 2003.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gsl-discuss/attachments/20050825/b3e791d3/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gsl-discuss
mailing list