new release candidate (gsl-1.5.90)

[Giulio Bottazzi]

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:56:58 +0000
Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk> wrote:

> You need e.g. GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,mask-all" ...  to avoid
> floating-point exceptions raising an unhandled SIGFPE signal.
> It should work with "mask-all".

Indeed it works with extended and double precision, while with
 
GSL_IEEE_MODE="single-precision,mask-all" make check

I obtain (with the 1.5 stable version too)

FAIL: gsl_fdiv(2,3) (0.666666686534881592 observed vs
0.66666666666666663 expected) 
FAIL: test

Is this as expected?

	G.

-- 
Giulio Bottazzi                 PGP Key ID:BAB0A33F 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gsl-discuss/attachments/20041231/00557356/attachment.sig>