gsl_poly_eval (second question)

[Brian Gough]

Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes writes:
 > Relating gsl_poly_eval and gsl_sf_poly_eval, and if I understood
 > correctly the reply mail, I should use *gsl_poly_eval*.

Yes.

 > Now, the question is: does this function works? I receive, always a
 > 0.0000 return value. Can anybody show an example, where is returns
 > a different value?

This function should work, it is tested in poly/test.c.  If there is
still a problem after looking there can you send more details about
your configuration thanks.