gsl_multifit

Kai Trukenmueller trukenm@ag2.mechanik.tu-darmstadt.de
Wed Dec 19 13:20:00 GMT 2001


Hi,

I benchmarked the programs on system with Athlon 1GHz, 640MB running Linux-2.4.10 with the following results:

Dimensions	(120,80)  (300,200)  (600,400)  (900,600)  (1200,800)
Octave-Script	0.060s    0.410s      3.390s     12.260s    39.790s
Compiled gsl    0.110s    2.240s      31.310s    2m7.590s   seg.fault

The gsl routine not just turns out to be much slower, it also seems to
be `instable' for higher orders (the results do not convege -> inft..)
Maybe sth. is wrong in my code. For low-orders (~<500) both results are
equivalent.

I'm not using the atlas-blas but gslcblas.

Code attached;
The octave-script `sinft.m' should be executable, and can be started
directely from the shell (iff /usr/bin/octave exists).
The matrix dimensions must be edited in the source code (in the c
programm, they are arguments).


-- 
:wq `Kai Trukenmueller'


More information about the Gsl-discuss mailing list