GNU Scientific Library (GSL) 0.8 is released
Martin Quinson
Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr
Wed Dec 19 13:20:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:54:37AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> > "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <edd@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> > > > > > * Packages for Debian GNU/Linux: libgsl0, libgsl0-dev, gsl-ref-psdoc
> > > > >
> > > > > Please add the actual links for these
> > > > >
> > > > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gsl/
> > > > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gsl-ref-psdoc/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, but shouldn't they install it using apt-get or dselect?
> > >
> > > Sure, that works as well, is generally speaking a lot easier and doesn't
> > > require the links.
> > >
> > > But there are situations where you just want to grab just the .orig.tar.gz,
> > > .dsc and .diff.gz to recompile them locally (e.g. when the build daemons
> >
> > That's what `apt-get source' is for.
>
> Again, "sure in general" but you cut & deleted a relevant other part of my
> previous prose: this doesn't cut the mustard if you follow an older release
> (say, potato) and you deb-src points to that too. Also, I prefer not have
> deb-src entries in sources.conf as this slows "apt-get update" down.
>
> All these reasons are fine and valid, but could someone please tell me (in
> private as this is getting way off-topic for the list) exactly what harm is
> caused by adding these links?
These urls are bad because they are so american-oriented. When you point to
http://packages.debian.org/libgsl0
http://packages.debian.org/libgsl0-dev
http://packages.debian.org/gsl-ref-psdoc
you have all the info you get from the url you gave (and much more), and
you can download what you want from the nearest mirror.
Bye, Mt.
More information about the Gsl-discuss
mailing list