make check error
Brian Gough
bjg@network-theory.co.uk
Tue Nov 7 13:04:00 GMT 2000
Matt Newville writes:
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill abserr (1.28571716286847917e-14 observed vs 1.28580546442745926e-14 expected)
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill neval (403 observed vs 31 expected)
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill last (7 observed vs 1 expected)
Do these errors go away with -O0 ? This function also involves
volatile. Perhaps handling of volatile is slightly different with this
compiler -- it is suspicious that the other integration tests all
pass (they don't use volatile).
See the KNOWN-PROBLEMS file for info on the monte failures.
More information about the Gsl-discuss
mailing list