ABI document

Mark Wielaard mark@klomp.org
Fri Aug 14 10:58:07 GMT 2020


Hi,

Vivek Das Mohapatra wrote:
>> If I'm wrong about that and we can document glibc specifics there (such
>> as DF_GNU_1_UNIQUE), then I guess that's fine, except that you will be
>> hard-pressed to find a glibc target that implements dynamic linking, but
>
> Hi - has there been a decision on this?
>
> I'd quite like to get DF_GNU_1_UNIQUE merged into binutils and glibc:
>
> If there's a right [external] place to document them I'm happy to do so
> but I'd rather the actual patches don't keep bitrotting while this is
> discussed.

The GNU Gabi now has a git backed website to document these things

https://sourceware.org/gnu-gabi


More information about the Gnu-gabi mailing list