[Bug libc/21531] fclose with NULL is SEGV should set errno EFAULT or EBADF

[jg at jguk dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21531

--- Comment #2 from Jon Grant <jg at jguk dot org> ---
I appreciate it is not in a specification, but NULL clearly is never going to
be a valid handle? Is it not better to reject it with EBADF or EFAULT? So
application can get the return code and appropriately handle it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.