[Bug libc/21488] ldd --unused seems to have opposite from stated behavior

[razi at google dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21488

--- Comment #5 from Razi Shaban <razi at google dot com> ---
If this is working as intended, perhaps we can change the documentation to
better explain how ldd is working? This is confusing and certainly appears
to have the opposite from its stated effect.


On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:03 AM schwab@linux-m68k.org <
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> wrote:

> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21488
>
> --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
> ldd -u is working as designed.  With lazy binding none of the libraries
> (except
> libc) are initially used.  Only applying the function relocations can mark
> the
> libraries as being used.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.