[Bug string/17087] Implement memcasemem()

[adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17087

--- Comment #5 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> ---
My understanding is bugzilla should not act as a backlog for new features
without a libc-alpha thread with a prior discussion about it.  I am saying it
to avoid the various current bugzillas where the upholder expects someone else
to take the job of pushing both the implementation and/or the discussion
forward.

I would expect for such cases to first have a discussion on libc-alpha and if
the new features is desirable in any way (either by trying pushing on some
standard or by adding a GNU extension), then we can process to open a bug with
the appropriated maillist history.

In this case, should it continue to linger on bugzilla or ask the bug opener to
bring on glibc?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.