[Bug math/3868] expl(huge negative value) incorrectly signals an OVERFLOW exception

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3868

Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|aj at suse dot de           |unassigned at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org

--- Comment #1 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-29 00:03:43 UTC ---
This report does not indicate what architecture was being used, which is
important information since there are several different implementations of each
libm function in glibc, especially for long double.  Anyway, for current
sources with x86 and x86_64 I can confirm the spurious OVERFLOW exception, but
don't see the correct UNDERFLOW one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.