[Bug manual/5461] New: LONG_LONG_MAX vs LLONG_MAX in range-of-type section of manual

[virdiq at gmail dot com]

It appears that the current online manual refers to LONG_LONG_MAX and
ULONG_LONG_MAX at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Range-of-Type.html#Range-of-Type

Instead of LLONG_MAX and ULLONG_MAX as defined in limits.h (checked against
2.6.1 and 2.7).

LONG_LONG_MAX/ULONG_LONG_MAX aren't defined in limits.h as the manual seems to
indicate.

-- 
           Summary: LONG_LONG_MAX vs LLONG_MAX in range-of-type section of
                    manual
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: manual
        AssignedTo: roland at gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: virdiq at gmail dot com
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5461

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.