[Bug libc/1969] getgrnam() should return an unmodified errno not ENOENT

[drepper at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2005-12-02 15:57 -------
There is nothing wrong with the implementation.  The code always did signal a
missing entry with a NULL pointer and ENOENT.  There is nothing in POSIX which
prohibits this.  The POSIX spec just said what has to happen for the error
conditions.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1969

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.