[Bug libc/167] malloc() eats excess ram
bluefoxicy at linux dot net
sourceware-bugzilla@sources.redhat.com
Sun May 16 20:52:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From bluefoxicy at linux dot net 2004-05-16 20:52 -------
Sorry, I meant to say
--
This raises one problem that can be manifested in two ways. The less extreme
problem is seen above: There is unused, but allocated ram. The more extreme
problem is best illustrated with a new example.
--
Instead
--
This raises one problem that can be manifested in two ways. The less extreme
problem is seen above: There are intermittent segments of unused, but allocated
ram. The more extreme problem is best illustrated with a new example, and is
simply a large scale manifestation of unused, allocated ram.
--
Sorry :)
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Glibc-bugs
mailing list