Function address incoherence
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Mon Aug 26 06:54:00 GMT 2019
* Andrea Cardaci:
> 00000860 <_dl_rtld_di_serinfo@@GLIBC_PRIVATE-0x83c0>:
Please not the -0x83c0 offset. The symbol information is not really
helpful, probably due to missing debugging information.
> So where does the _start reported by the disassemble command comes
> from? Is this a GDB bug or I'm missing something here?
Both the main program and the dynamic loader have a _start symbol. The
GDB behavior you observed is typical for such symbol conflicts.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Gdb
mailing list