GSoC
Simon Marchi
simon.marchi@polymtl.ca
Thu Feb 9 15:48:00 GMT 2017
On 2017-02-08 12:12, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Simon> It would be interesting to gather some feedback from those who
> lead
> Simon> this initiative in the past. Would you suggest trying to go for
> it
> Simon> again? Why, why not?
>
> I did it in the past but stopped because I wasn't spending enough time
> mentoring. I think it is worth doing but you have to be more organized
> and committed than I was.
Ok, thanks for your feedback.
So since nobody spoke against it, I'll submit an application today,
we'll see where it leads.
> Simon> On my side, there's the output colouring support which I'd like
> Simon> to see become a reality some day :).
>
> I actually did this, but I didn't submit it. I got sort of mired in
> design choices.
>
> The first approach I took was to just hack some color stuff directly
> the
> CLI ui-out, and add a way to "set color <mumble>" (I don't actually
> remember exactly how I spelled this, and the branch is long gone).
> This
> required some hacks to get the column computation to be correct so that
> wrapping wouldn't suffer. I think I just made it so the color string,
> whatever it was, was assumed not to take any space -- a hack since this
> wasn't actually enforced.
>
> This was a bit too inflexible for me so I abandoned it.
>
>
> The second approach I took (I still have this branch) was to let the
> Python layer insert an object that would replace the CLI ui-out object.
> Then colorizing and other reformatting -- the Python ui-out object is
> "MI-like" and so had access to more data -- could be done by writing
> some Python code.
>
> I liked this approach ok but it needed some hacks (maybe since
> obsoleted
> due to Pedro's recent work, not sure). Also I think it suffered
> because
> there was no way to get the wrap hints into the Python layer.
Well first of all, what is your idea of how the coloring should be?
As a first step, I am envisioning, at least as a first step, to have
symbols, value, file paths, etc, each printed in their own color, so
that it's easy stop quickly spot the relevant information in a printout.
I have made a mockup here:
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~simark/ssg/filemC7ZUZ.png
However I have found that it's easy to go overboard with it, at which
point it looses of it usefulness, despite being a nice Christmas tree:
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~simark/ssg/fileEv2diU.png
> And, finally, for something like "set color", there's no good way to
> implement completion because there isn't a list of the table- and
> column-names. This could be done by introducing enums or something
> like
> that, but at that point the patch is going to be beyond what I would
> want to commit to.
I don't understand this part. Which tables/columns?
Thanks!
Simon
More information about the Gdb
mailing list