x86_64-elf gdb

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Mon, 2015-03-30 15:59:49 -0500, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> wrote:
> On 3/30/2015 3:54 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it.  Is that
> > > enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition?
> > That seems odd to me.  What would be the advantage of pushing that
> > patch if it's a configuration that you can't test?
>
> At the moment, x86_64-elf doesn't even build for binutils-gdb. It
> fails due to a missing gdb configuration.
> 
> And if binutils-gdb doesn't complete successfully, that means gcc
> can't be built for this target.
> 
> Jan.. do you build binutils-gdb and gcc for this target?

I didn't build it until a minute ago, just x86_64-linux was on the
list. It's added now, so let's wait for the first build to take place
and see how well that works.

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:              Alles sollte so einfach wie möglich gemacht sein.
the second  :                          Aber nicht einfacher.  (Einstein)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/attachments/20150331/c90ed3c9/attachment.sig>