Old OSes compatibility [Re: 64-bit (>4GB) inferior data types rules; TYPE_LENGTH: unsigned -> ULONGEST]

Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Mon Oct 1 18:08:00 GMT 2012


On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:57:36 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I see gnulib vasprintf check-in should go along the future %z check-in.
> 
> I am not opposed to this, but we should make sure that gnulib's check
> for vasprintf does verify availability of %z. I'm not sure that it is
> the case today.

That's true gnulib does not check for %z.  But whole .microsoft.com does not
mention vasprintf so I believe it would get substituted by gnulib there.

Currently it probably gets substituted by libiberty/_doprnt.c which does not
support %z so the vasprintf inclusion by gnulib is still needed.


Thanks,
Jan



More information about the Gdb mailing list