Time to expand "Program received signal" ?

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 10:26:00 GMT 2012


On 11/13/2012 10:40 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>>>>>   [Thread 0x7ffff7fd0740 (LWP 12019) "sigstep-threads"] #1 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
>>   Thread 2 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
> 
> GDB shouldn't mention threads at all, unless the program being debugged
> is multi-threaded.

Since 7.0 GDB models non-threaded programs as single threaded.

-- 
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb mailing list