Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 10:26:00 GMT 2012
On 11/13/2012 10:40 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>>>>> [Thread 0x7ffff7fd0740 (LWP 12019) "sigstep-threads"] #1 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
>> Thread 2 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
>
> GDB shouldn't mention threads at all, unless the program being debugged
> is multi-threaded.
Since 7.0 GDB models non-threaded programs as single threaded.
--
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb
mailing list