Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not.

[Russell Shaw]

On 06/04/12 23:16, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> I do not recommend that GDB use C++.
>>

...

>> All it requires is a few more short lines of explanatory design
>> notes scattered through the code and clarity of thought.
>
> This is almost offensive. If it was that easy, how about you start
> sending some patches?

I made up a heap of gdb patches over several months for a microcontroller a few 
years ago, and used those patches for real work. There was still a bit of 
buggyness i couldn't fix.

I did not submit them because i could not verify them in a robust way due to the 
gdb internals documentation i found very lacking, but my (lack of) knowledge of 
unix process handling was a contributor too.

I definitely would not have put in the effort if it meant dealing with C++.

I'm not doing any gdb work until i understand how the debugging format works.
There is not much documentation on that.

The coding is easy. Lack of documentation is the hard part. Using C++ isn't 
magically going to make the internals of gdb easier to maintain.