GIT and CVS

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:38:37 +0200, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I really don't think this is an argument for one version control system 
> over another.  They all seem to make it far too easy to commit patches 
> where you've accidentally failed to add new files to version control.

The point was to ensure the same version control system is used both locally
and server-side.  Which requires dVCS.  Which excludes for example SVN (and
also CVS).

I had a fear CVS may be considered as a valid VCS.


Thanks,
Jan