attach u/i oddity

[Pedro Alves]

On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19:11:21, Doug Evans wrote:

> There was some cleverness that was wanted, was "tricky to get right
> right for remote targets. 

You misunderstood.  I meant the new warning I had suggested in the
same email I wrote that, the one where we'd check whether the loaded
file is the same that the target is reporting the process is
running is tricky on remote targets.

-- 
Pedro Alves