question, re: gdb.base/label.exp

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Thu Feb 24 20:09:00 GMT 2011


>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> The question is if we say this GCC is broken (and XFAIL it or move it to
Jan> gdb.dwarf2/) or whether GDB should use SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS.

Jan> I am for the latter, DWARF talks for DW_TAG_label about
Jan> DW_AT_low_pc and not about DW_AT_decl_line.

Yes, I also think that makes sense.

Tom



More information about the Gdb mailing list