support biarch gcore?

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Jul 8 05:05:00 GMT 2010


On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:47 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
>>> > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately, it also turned out that the section sizes provided for
>>> > .reg in those targets that have gdbarch_core_regset_sections, while
>>> > currently unused, were also nearly all wrong ...
>>> >
>>> > The following patch fixes those sizes, and changes linux-nat.c to
>>> > use them.
>>
>>> Although I don't feel qualified to judge the powerpc bits, this makes
>>> quite a bit of sense to me.  And yes, the value for amd64-linux is
>>> obviously wrong.
>>
>> OK, thanks!
>>
>> I've checked the patch in now.
>>
>
> Does this fix
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11467
>

It works.  Here is a patch to add a testcase.  OK to install?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.
--
2010-07-07  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	PR corefiles/11467
	* gdb.arch/amd64-gcore32.exp: New.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gdb-32bit-8.patch
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 7530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/attachments/20100708/1791ce56/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gdb mailing list