[patch] Fix CLONE_VM vs. TLS [Re: Is CLONE_VM really needed in gdbserver?]

Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Mon Feb 1 20:20:00 GMT 2010


On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:41:28 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Going to check it in in some times as this change is IMO pre-approved.
[...]
> gdb/gdbserver/
> 2010-01-29  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR libc/11214:
> 	* linux-low.c (linux_tracefork_child) [!(__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU)]: New.
> 	(linux_test_for_tracefork): Move `stack' into [__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU].
> 	(linux_test_for_tracefork) [!(__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU)]: New.
> 
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2010-01-29  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR libc/11214:
> 	* gdb.threads/current-lwp-dead.c: Include features.h.
> 	(HAS_NOMMU): New.
> 	(fn, main): Move CLONE_VM into [__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU].

Checked-in:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-02/msg00010.html


Regards,
Jan



More information about the Gdb mailing list