[RFC] Let "gcore" command accept a suffix argument

[Michael Snyder]

Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> I don't like the above suggestion, but I assume you are
>> talking about the original idea.
> 
> Personally, I think that we should look at python. As far as I could
> tell, I was already able to do everything with the current python
> support, even if a little convoluted. We can also start working on
> a python layer for process record too.  That would be my prefered
> approach.
> 
> Otherwise, what do you think of Tom's suggestion (new "eval" command)?

Well I wouldn't want to be stuck implementing it...
I don't know python!   ;-)

Would it be able to include the incr? "eval gcore foo.$a++"?