System call support in reversible debugging
Sean Chen
sean.chen1234@gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 18:11:00 GMT 2009
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a old query. For now, this munmap just can let prec ignore
> some memory change record entry.
>
> You can answer 'no' then inferior will keep exec. Most of thing will
> be find. :)
>
> Maybe we need update this query looks not so scary and do some other update.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 14:31, Sean Chen <sean.chen1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can gdb record system calls without checkpoints or snapshots
>> currently? If not, is it possible to record the instructions and
>> reverse the inferior?
>>
>> When I recorded fclose(), I got the following message.
>> The next instruction is syscall munmap. It will free the memory addr
>> = 0xb7fe0000 len = 4096. It will make record target get error. Do
>> you want to stop the program?([y] or n)
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Sean Chen
>>
>
Thanks for your reply.
Does it mean that we have to ignore all memory changes in all system
calls or kernel space code?
--
Best Regards,
Sean Chen
More information about the Gdb
mailing list