gdb.cp/templates.exp, ctor/dtor breakpoints, etc....

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Christophe LYON wrote:
> Doing this, I follow GCC behaviour, but I get a regression. If we don't  
> consider this a GCC bug, it means that the way GDB recognizes ctor/dtor  
> (any probably any overloaded function) is to be revisited? Am I right?

Yes, all of the name recognition stuff is broken.  We shouldn't be
relying on mangled names, since there are compilers we can not change
as easily as GCC or yours that do not emit them.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery