gdb doesn't show all threads, but gdbserver does

teawater teawater@gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 03:08:00 GMT 2009


http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00232.html

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:07, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> I make a patch to output a warning.
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00234.html
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:45, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>>> It's actually libthread_db that needs a non-global symbol from
>>> libpthread.
>>
>> IOW, it's a glibc feature :)
>>
>> Stripping libpthread appears to be a very common mistake:
>>
>> - we've seen it twice on this list in the last two weeks,
>> - I made it myself 4 weeks ago, even though I *knew* that libpthread
>>  must not be stripped.
>>
>> I wonder if we should warn glibc users? Something like:
>>
>>  Warning: your /lib64/libpthread.so.0 has been stripped.
>>  GDB will not see other threads, and multithreaded debugging will
>>  be unreliable.
>>  See http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/... for further info.
>>
>> --
>> Paul Pluzhnikov
>>
>



More information about the Gdb mailing list