[reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse

[teawater]

Maybe we can make user have more choices.
Of course, some of target can just support one choice.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 23:21, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:03:42PM +0800, teawater wrote:
>> 1. The instruction in this address already reverse executed, it make
>> program status back to before forward execute this instruction.
>
> I like this approach; I believe it's what we used in the qemu reverse
> implementation also.  It means that you have the same state when
> you're pointing at the start of a source line: it has not yet executed.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
>