multi-process remote protocol extensions

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Not stricly multi-process related, but while we're at it, two
> > > nibbles `AA' only is unnecessarilly limiting.  That was
> > > the other reason for proposing new status packets.
> >
> > Allow more than just two nibbles if gdb supports the semicolon?
> 
> How can the stub know if GDB supports the semicolon?

By the multiprocess announcement, I suppose.  We already needed to
know this since ;process would break otherwise.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery