PowerPC prologue analysis

Aleksandar Ristovski aristovski@qnx.com
Tue Jul 29 16:52:00 GMT 2008


Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:42:29AM -0400, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>> And for the reference: Daniel's patch (
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-12/msg00111.html ) does
>> solve the problem with not all registers saved.
>>
>> Why is the patch not in HEAD gdb?
> 
> There's a couple of questions in the posting and I never figured out
> the answers to them.  I'll be back to them at some point.
> 

May I suggest that you break the patch in two patches: one dealing with not-all-registers-saved (i.e. gpr_mask) and the rest?

I extracted the gpr_mask part here with the testsuite changes and I believe this part of the patch is safe to apply. 

Attached: Fragment extracted from Daniel's patch.



-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: rs6000-tdep.c.Daniel-gpr_mask-part.diff
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/attachments/20080729/edee7ca4/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: gdb_arch_powerpc-prologue.exp.Daniel-gpr_mask-part.diff
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/attachments/20080729/edee7ca4/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Gdb mailing list