-var-update using formatted value

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:48:40PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> Both changes, i.e., printcmd.c and c-exp.y?

Right.

> Presumably if the change to c-exp.y is committed, there should be similar
> changes to ada-exp.y, f-exp.y etc.  Does it not matter that this prefix
> is not part of the underlying language?

Right.  As long as it doesn't conflict with the underlying language,
no, it doesn't matter - GDB tries to accept the whole source language,
but also accepts other things.

> Also, I think only the change to printcmd.c is necessary to solve Marcs bug
> report about -var-update.

I think that report is covered by two of the other patches I reviewed
today.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery