call_function_by_hand doesn't restore target async?

[Pedro Alves]

On Thursday 04 December 2008 21:36:31, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > In practice, and
> > especially with non-stop mode, making infcalls async is ranging somewhere
> > from hard to impossible.
> 
> If that's the general consensus, at least for now, would there be any

Dunno if that's the consensus; I'd really love it if someone proved me wrong.

> objection to submitting a patch that has call_function_by_hand invoke
> proceed() in a TRY_CATCH?  After cleaning things up it could rethrow.

I don't object in principle, but I'm no foreteller either.  :-)

-- 
Pedro Alves