Python not optional?

[Mark Kettenis]

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:37:10 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:
> 
> Mark> I always assumed that the Python scripting support would be optional.
> 
> It is supposed to be.
> 
> Mark>   Luckily this isn't too difficult to fix; the attached rough
> Mark> diff does the job, but might need a bit of cleanup.
> 
> I will send a different patch shortly.
> 
> It would be helpful if you could mention the errors you saw.

Oops, sorry.  It seems I didn't check out the new python subdirectory.
All's fine now.