Breakpoint in C++ class constructor is never reached

[Bobo]

Hi,

Downloaded one of the latest snapshots of the HEAD release, still have 
problems with building it:

source='decNumber.c' object='decNumber.o' libtool=no gcc 
 -I.././libdecnumber -I.   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute 
-Wcast-qual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c decNumber.c
source='decContext.c' object='decContext.o' libtool=no gcc 
 -I.././libdecnumber -I.   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute 
-Wcast-qual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c 
decContext.c
source='' object='decimal32.o' libtool=no gcc  -I.././libdecnumber -I.   -W 
-Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wcast-qual -pedantic 
-Wno-long-long -I.././libdecnumber -I.  -c
gcc: no input files
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `decimal32.o'
Current working directory /usr/local/asm/gdb-6.7.50.20071104/libdecnumber
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-libdecnumber'
Current working directory /usr/local/asm/gdb-6.7.50.20071104
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'


wsasd179:/scratch/gdb-6.7.50.20071104 % nedit libdecnumber/Makefile

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:05:25 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that Solaris' patch tool doesn't support the unified diff
> format. I didn't know that, sorry about this problem.
> 
> I don't have write access to the GCC repo (which is where libdecnumber
> is hosted), so I couldn't commit it by myself. But Janis just did. It
> will appear in tomorrow's GDB snapshot.
> 
> If you don't want to wait until then, you can check out now from the CVS
> repository by following the instructions here:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/
> 
> -- 
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> Software Engineer
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:10 +0200, Bobo wrote:
>> Unfortunately i can not patch the attached file. I get the following:
>> shell:patch -p1 < /tmp/remove-gnuism.diff
>>    Looks like a unified context diff.
>> File to patch:
>> 
>> Is it because my version of the patch tool does not match with the diff 
>> version used to create the patch?
>> 
>> Anyway... Thiago, when are you planning to commit the patch so that i get 
>>it 
>> with the latest snapshot?
>> 
>> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:13:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
>><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > The patch hasn't been commited yet, so it won't appear in the snapshot.
>> > 
>> > In the meantime, you can use the attached patch in a recent GDB snapshot
>> > with these commands:
>> > 
>> > $ cd gdb-6.7.50.20071030
>> > $ patch -p1 < /path/to/attached/remove-gnuism.diff
>> > 
>> > This should get you a GDB source code tree which will build in your
>> > environment.
>> > -- 
>> > []'s
>> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
>> > Software Engineer
>> > IBM Linux Technology Center
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:53 +0200, Bobo wrote:
>> >> Sorry i don't really know what "off-list a regenerated configure 
>>script" 
>> >> means and what i need to do with it to verify if the build problem is 
>> >> gone...
>> >> 
>> >> Is there maybe a snapshot available with the latest changes of Thiago?
>> >> (the latest snapshot version i can find on pub/gdb/snapshots/ is from 
>>26 
>> >>Oct 
>> >> 2007)
>> >> 
>> >> Anyway, i would like to check if the build problem is solved. please 
>>let 
>> >>me 
>> >> know how i can do that.
>> >> 
>> >> Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:32:12 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann 
>> >><bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>> >> 
>> >> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:02 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> >> >> > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:31:28 -0400
>> >> >> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>> >> >> > > Oh dear.  GCC requires GNU make, but GDB is not supposed to, I 
>> >>don't
>> >> >> > > think.  This is a new problem.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I regularly build GDB with OpenBSD make, so yes this is new (and 
>>I'd
>> >> >> > very much appreciate it if it got fixed).
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I will work on this ASAP.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I just posted a patch to fix this. Sorry for the delay, it took me 
>>some
>> >> > time to determine if I had copyright assignment to contribute to GCC.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I tested the change with NetBSD's make, so I think the GNUisms are 
>>gone.
>> >> > If this is not enough to fix your build problems, please let me know.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I can send you off-list a regenerated configure script if you want to
>> >> > test the patch and don't have autoconf 2.59 handy.
>> >> > -- 
>> >> > []'s
>> >> > Thiago Jung Bauermann
>> >> > Software Engineer
>> >> > IBM Linux Technology Center
>>        
>> 
>> 
>> ---------
>> Àêöèÿ 'Êóïè ñóõèå ñòðîèòåëüíûå ñìåñè ÑÀÐÌÀÒ è ïîëó÷è ïðèç' ïðîäîëæà åòñÿ! 
>> Ïîäðîáíîñòè íà http://www.sarmat.by
>> 
> 
> 

 

------------------
Ôîðåêñ Êëóáó 10 ëåò! http://www.forexclub.by