DELAYED: GDB 6.7 branch creation scheduled June 25th

[Nick Roberts]

 > In terms of learning from this thread: I interpreted your questions
 > as vague general questions and I couldn't understand the motivation
 > behind them. So I answered accordingly. Maybe I was naive, maybe I
 > misinterpreted. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that you know
 > how I operate, now.  So if you tell us right from the beginning what
 > it is that you need, and why, we will answer your request a lot faster.

Hopefully they weren't vague, but they were deliberately general because I
thought there were others who wanted similar bugs resolved before the release,
and I tried to suggest a policy for future releases too.  As no one supported
those ideas I moved to my specific issue.

 > > through this forum, hopefully to the attention of others.
 > 
 > I'm sorry, but I think you're using the wrong communication channel.
 > Pinging the relevant parties on gdb-patches should be a lot more
 > effective.

I thought gdb-patches was primarily for the submission of patches and gdb
for more general matters.  It's probably unimportant though, as I guess the
global maintainers read both.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob