[rfc / remote protocol] ELF segment based qOffsets

[Sergei Poselenov]

Hello Daniel,

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:27:33PM +0300, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
>> You see, the warnings are caused by the fact that the segment 01 has
>> address/size values which wraps to 0 in the following 'if' condition
>> introduced by the $subj in elfread.c, elf_symfile_segments():
>> ...
>> && vma < segments[j]->p_vaddr + segments[j]->p_memsz)
> 
> Drat.  Yes, this just seems like a bug.  I'll try to fix it later.
> 

Please review attached.

>> The place above is trivial to fix, but I wonder will be any
>> other consequences to the remote debugging of such kind of
>> images? (I can't try this at the moment)
> 
> I don't think there should be any problems.  There would be a little
> trouble debugging code from those sections if the image was relocated
> (qOffsets response), but yours shouldn't be; it goes at the address in
> the ELF file.
> 
OK, thanks.

Regards,
Sergei
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gdb-6.7-uboot-sections.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 470 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/attachments/20071219/d9319634/attachment.bin>