asynchronous MI output commands

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Sat May 6 16:52:00 GMT 2006


On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Right, synchronous is a response to a command. That's also the
> definition I was using. However the initial output is not a response to
> a command and it also does not semantically end up being asynchronous.

Why do you think it is not asynchronous?  If you want to be picky about
the grammar, it's an out of band message.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gdb mailing list